Climate & Energy Design Data
Climate Design Data: Yenagoa, Nigeria
How to research climate design data for a specific site in Yenagoa — the controlling authority, source documents, and checks to run before you rely on a number.
Last updated August 31, 2026 · Location data from the [GeoNames NG dump](https://download.geonames.org/export/dump/NG.zip) (CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-08-31, GeoNames ID 2318123). Regulatory starting point: [Federal Ministry of Housing and Urban Development and the applicable state authority](https://fmhud.gov.ng/). Figures are illustrative — verify against the current locally adopted edition for the site. Climate screening data from the [NASA POWER Climatology API documentation](https://power.larc.nasa.gov/docs/services/api/temporal/climatology/) and [exact point response](https://power.larc.nasa.gov/api/temporal/climatology/point?parameters=T2M%2CT2M_MAX%2CT2M_MIN%2CRH2M%2CPRECTOTCORR%2CWS10M&community=SB&longitude=6.26764&latitude=4.92675&format=JSON), retrieved 2026-08-31; source period: 20-year Meteorological and Solar Monthly & Annual Climatologies (January 2001 - December 2020). NASA POWER values are gridded screening statistics, not code design conditions or guaranteed local observations.
Direct answer
NASA POWER's 2001–2020 climatology at the Yenagoa reference point reports an annual mean 2 m temperature of 25.9 °C and relative humidity of 88.0%. The highest monthly maximum is 34.1 °C in February, while the lowest monthly minimum is 13.5 °C in January; these are screening statistics, not code design temperatures. The point response uses LST and the 20-year Meteorological and Solar Monthly & Annual Climatologies (January 2001 - December 2020); its annual corrected precipitation is 6.45 mm/day and annual 10 m wind speed is 2.23 m/s. For climate design data, use the 34.1 °C and 13.5 °C monthly extrema to screen seasonal exposure, then obtain the adopted percentile design conditions. NASA POWER is gridded climatology: verify elevation, microclimate, urban exposure, station or weather-file suitability, current code edition and the authority's required source before design use.
Prepared by Harth · Harth transformed the cited NASA POWER climatology into this screening table; project design conditions and local applicability remain unreviewed · Published 2026-08-26 · Updated 2026-08-31.
What must be verified for Yenagoa?
Yenagoa is represented here at approximately 4.9268, 6.2676 for discovery and workflow planning. A project address, parcel, elevation, exposure, authority, and submission date must replace that city-centre reference before design use.
How should climate design data be established?
- Fix the surveyed site and local time basis.
- Select an authoritative weather source or a named solar-position algorithm.
- Record period, percentile or scenario and units.
- Test sensitivity to elevation, exposure, urban form and horizon.
- Save the source file, retrieval date and checker in the model record.
| Input | Project-specific evidence | QA question |
|---|---|---|
| Site | surveyed coordinates, elevation and horizon | Does the point represent the building? |
| Weather/solar method | named dataset, algorithm, period and time basis | Are station, time zone and units explicit? |
| Design scenario | current and future scenario agreed by the team | Is an average being mistaken for an extreme? |
| Compliance | adopted local document and edition | Was applicability confirmed with the authority? |
What are the limits of this worksheet?
This climate-design-workflow page is a project-starting worksheet, not a design value or approval. The controlling authority and qualified professionals for the Yenagoa site remain authoritative.
Which related searches does this primary location record cover?
This primary route consolidates the location evidence needed for Climate Design Data, Weather File Guide, Overheating Weather Data, Building Climate Checklist. A narrower route should be released only when it adds a materially different official source, calculation, process, threshold or worked example.
Yenagoa NASA POWER monthly climate screening table
| Month | Mean °C | Monthly max °C | Monthly min °C | RH % | Precipitation mm/day | Wind at 10 m m/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January | 25.52 | 33.21 | 13.52 | 78.93 | 0.85 | 2.07 |
| February | 26.69 | 34.13 | 14.93 | 84.06 | 1.86 | 2.17 |
| March | 26.94 | 33.46 | 20.29 | 88.07 | 3.54 | 2.21 |
| April | 26.83 | 33.54 | 21.67 | 89.25 | 5.39 | 2.16 |
| May | 26.47 | 32.98 | 22.61 | 90.16 | 7.09 | 2.07 |
| June | 25.57 | 31.46 | 22.02 | 90.95 | 11.00 | 2.37 |
| July | 24.90 | 30.69 | 20.33 | 90.88 | 10.78 | 2.70 |
| August | 24.74 | 30.83 | 20.48 | 90.48 | 10.30 | 2.87 |
| September | 25.05 | 31.30 | 21.42 | 91.66 | 13.10 | 2.49 |
| October | 25.57 | 32.16 | 22.09 | 91.19 | 8.13 | 2.09 |
| November | 26.20 | 32.24 | 20.81 | 88.90 | 4.18 | 1.78 |
| December | 25.96 | 32.88 | 15.18 | 81.61 | 1.05 | 1.78 |
Month-by-month climate interpretation
- January: mean temperature 25.52 °C is 0.34 °C below the annual mean; the monthly max–min span is 19.69 °C. Relative humidity is 78.93% (9.08 points below annual), while corrected precipitation at 0.85 mm/day is 5.60 mm/day drier than the annual daily rate.
- February: mean temperature 26.69 °C is 0.83 °C above the annual mean; the monthly max–min span is 19.20 °C. Relative humidity is 84.06% (3.95 points below annual), while corrected precipitation at 1.86 mm/day is 4.59 mm/day drier than the annual daily rate.
- March: mean temperature 26.94 °C is 1.08 °C above the annual mean; the monthly max–min span is 13.17 °C. Relative humidity is 88.07% (0.06 points above annual), while corrected precipitation at 3.54 mm/day is 2.91 mm/day drier than the annual daily rate.
- April: mean temperature 26.83 °C is 0.97 °C above the annual mean; the monthly max–min span is 11.87 °C. Relative humidity is 89.25% (1.24 points above annual), while corrected precipitation at 5.39 mm/day is 1.06 mm/day drier than the annual daily rate.
- May: mean temperature 26.47 °C is 0.61 °C above the annual mean; the monthly max–min span is 10.37 °C. Relative humidity is 90.16% (2.15 points above annual), while corrected precipitation at 7.09 mm/day is 0.64 mm/day wetter than the annual daily rate.
- June: mean temperature 25.57 °C is 0.29 °C below the annual mean; the monthly max–min span is 9.44 °C. Relative humidity is 90.95% (2.94 points above annual), while corrected precipitation at 11.00 mm/day is 4.55 mm/day wetter than the annual daily rate.
- July: mean temperature 24.90 °C is 0.96 °C below the annual mean; the monthly max–min span is 10.36 °C. Relative humidity is 90.88% (2.87 points above annual), while corrected precipitation at 10.78 mm/day is 4.33 mm/day wetter than the annual daily rate.
- August: mean temperature 24.74 °C is 1.12 °C below the annual mean; the monthly max–min span is 10.35 °C. Relative humidity is 90.48% (2.47 points above annual), while corrected precipitation at 10.30 mm/day is 3.85 mm/day wetter than the annual daily rate.
- September: mean temperature 25.05 °C is 0.81 °C below the annual mean; the monthly max–min span is 9.88 °C. Relative humidity is 91.66% (3.65 points above annual), while corrected precipitation at 13.10 mm/day is 6.65 mm/day wetter than the annual daily rate.
- October: mean temperature 25.57 °C is 0.29 °C below the annual mean; the monthly max–min span is 10.07 °C. Relative humidity is 91.19% (3.18 points above annual), while corrected precipitation at 8.13 mm/day is 1.68 mm/day wetter than the annual daily rate.
- November: mean temperature 26.20 °C is 0.34 °C above the annual mean; the monthly max–min span is 11.43 °C. Relative humidity is 88.90% (0.89 points above annual), while corrected precipitation at 4.18 mm/day is 2.27 mm/day drier than the annual daily rate.
- December: mean temperature 25.96 °C is 0.10 °C above the annual mean; the monthly max–min span is 17.70 °C. Relative humidity is 81.61% (6.40 points below annual), while corrected precipitation at 1.05 mm/day is 5.40 mm/day drier than the annual daily rate.
Harth retrieved this point climatology from NASA POWER API v2.9.7 for location record 2318123. It is a reproducible screening dataset, not an hourly weather file, forecast, code design condition or substitute for local professional review.
Where can you explore related guidance?
- Explore all climate data guidance
- Climate Design Data: Port Harcourt, Nigeria
- Climate Design Data: Warri, Nigeria
- Climate Design Data: Owerri, Nigeria
- Climate Design Data: Aba, Nigeria
Sources and method
Location data from the GeoNames NG dump (CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-08-31, GeoNames ID 2318123). Regulatory starting point: Federal Ministry of Housing and Urban Development and the applicable state authority. Figures are illustrative — verify against the current locally adopted edition for the site. Climate screening data from the NASA POWER Climatology API documentation and exact point response, retrieved 2026-08-31; source period: 20-year Meteorological and Solar Monthly & Annual Climatologies (January 2001 - December 2020). NASA POWER values are gridded screening statistics, not code design conditions or guaranteed local observations.
Source links
Frequently asked questions
What does NASA POWER climatology show for Yenagoa?
For the Yenagoa reference point, the 2001–2020 NASA POWER climatology reports 25.9 °C annual mean temperature, 88.0% relative humidity and 6.45 mm/day corrected precipitation. The monthly maximum peaks at 34.1 °C in February.
Can the Yenagoa climatology replace project design temperatures or an hourly weather file?
No. The Yenagoa response is gridded monthly climatology; its lowest monthly minimum of 13.5 °C in January is not a code percentile or observed site extreme. Verify elevation, local exposure, the required weather file or design-condition source and the current adopted code.
Related pages
- Climate Design Data Workflow for Seattle, WA
How architects should retrieve and document authoritative climate design conditions for Seattle, WA, including station, percentile, units, edition, and code checks.
- Climate Design Data Workflow for Tucson, AZ
How architects should retrieve and document authoritative climate design conditions for Tucson, AZ, including station, percentile, units, edition, and code checks.
- Climate Design Data Workflow for Washington, DC
How architects should retrieve and document authoritative climate design conditions for Washington, DC, including station, percentile, units, edition, and code checks.
- Climate Design Data: Yola, Nigeria
Climate Design Data for Yola: source-led evidence, applicability and project QA checklist.
- Climate Design Data: Zamboanga, Philippines
Climate Design Data for Zamboanga: source-led evidence, applicability and project QA checklist.
- Climate Design Data: Zaria, Nigeria
Climate Design Data for Zaria: source-led evidence, applicability and project QA checklist.